No. 23-6712
Abner Renato Natareno-Calderon v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure judicial-presumption reasonableness-standard rita-precedent rita-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should clarify how a defendant who challenges the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence may rebut an appellate presumption of reasonableness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court should clarify how a defendant who challenges the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence may rebut an appellate presumption of reasonableness of the type recognized in Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007).
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2024)
Attorneys
Abner Renato Natareno-Calderon
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent