Whether Oklahoma violated its own rules of criminal procedure retroactively by applying a new rule to Petitioner's post-conviction proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © ighety Oklahoma violeédl its eon law in at efort to desu Pair reght fy Aue pocess of lw pursuant to the (18 ghencudetert when it applied is new cule of xerinal Procedure (Shite ex rel Math ff v. Wallace, $97 73d 6 $6) rebmacteve ly hy Patetioner's pest Convichion prteediing® O whether the Oklahona Pek Comyrchion Pocedure Met is ahegucte ank Tidlep en dent © | @ Whetfter Oklallena violated its own rites Jiu in an eftirt 4 dong fadshioner's right fo dx pass oP law pars to He 1 Armen nest thea it iced . coreg dearly esheblshed federcl law thot “Stale tours Jenny have no fd on ty hy Liedinns fr Conduct comuntted in Indian beware "@ whe the, He Spremacy Clause fife WS. Consttetion reguuted Okaloma. jp ule en the merits of Riitioner's juiisdichiond olaio, wlch up preanised om bath the provigions in treaties behiren tHe WS. aud Chorkee Nebren auct Lecboah stahde , when presenhed on callatenl reviews @ wheter On Lndten nay waive, by pleading pe ia Sta cout te repuared preemphion of shite prrseastion by federal Statite or realy Piovisions ind whether Such Waiver Must be Pnewineg ark Vo luackory ;