Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the state court proceedings, including issues of due process, ineffective assistance of counsel, and judicial misconduct

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED With such dear and cmgre evince proceed within te antexed dounmenls & odubits, horein, Pebitioner grays hat his Hononbie, Court review the tolalty the taller Neginaty fon the Wadhtgton Gay, Sake & Oregon, Ceuit Court, leading fo the Org Apple, Court, ak Gally to the Unde Gules Vistar Caw, Cou & Oregon, oul all othur cout urldies Sn bebweor Cndhng, bak a Voit fo, the Organ Sake Bar, ood te Conmin on Aelia Fas and Disability 5 Alm Be Unite Sates Cour of Reperls Felunl dudiual Miscou Compass 22. ond ask, Gull a case & ths Wagnitude be aay Squi conf be Hee Seleval (teal cusen and te he whale & He makin?” “ Col a case sade as tals , 16 Soctded ugor, prevent extrume mnircaatages & wien ann camsed by a fowps oF Rekwodb-e & Cory ALtorS Comwitthy onmes Const tukng fhe QT.C.0, Auk? Ov puk rrore Siogly TE sp, shall it be ied upon for case lou’?” T Semen belek tase ys shall be br A Gre, . Form 42.010