Bryant Calloway v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the fundamental fairness of the criminal trial was violated by the district court's denial of the petitioner's motion to dismiss the indictment based on the unreliable and incredible testimony of the government's key witness
Question Presented, <= _ Hold sucists-debole the denol ofa __. wheblecthedistidtz ee Nas. n-tsproce tings oa oo ne Molton ts _pecued Grand wa zestimmy fc eT — | Parkes tate proweding [ne coption idenbfies oll Doches it this cose = a fact estntbe Prweeding Peyfnt Calloway (Pro-Sey Sondtien Ore (AUSAY nn a ueshon Resorteel a) _ ___ ras ) | | | ode ot Authothes Poy Pelow GT _Constitstional Brvision scouted btihon oe Werte Ceti _ N osoascet Ctocling the Petthag at A indidnent-o ania pei he gtr —_ po acelin ta wll bedekd pia e Tnud Circuits deusion tailed tollow ths ads It | . Acedent addressing belle the ofotd yoy —_ “Table cf-Adthoiies [ated Stoles\Vlllions 50406 2b(laa) lo. a Giglio UniedStoles _4Osbs 27S(qggyi 11 ——_Wnttd States V ours 0S 47 igo) ee te ——— Ne ais 500-5 JOY 959) Blac Metloniels 7 US 113 (9000) Gp _| Wks" Siam Cot Rle lc | Otter fufnorities! US Const Amend VS es Opin Blow The cpinion of the third Cirwitofh ning the districts Cort \dgrert iS attodied fo Nt petition . Suiisdidion , “The United Stoles Dstt curt Ac the Eastern Disihds of Pennsylvania had \urisdicton oft Anis Xedetal. criminal cose. Pont 40 18 USC 3231. The Cott of Appeols hod \urisdictian pot Wart 10 58 SC OM\ ond If USC? 3TH. Thal cart entered \pdogmentt-on Sept 39083, This petition is cine filed within ninety dogs ofl The Judgerent js wodd. the wrisdicioy this cult 1s ined Pusuont 4o 28 Sie I9-S4()) | Constitstional Peoisten “towhied “The Fifth Ainendnt +p te United Stes Contin yades | ‘Ko pefson shall be held 40 answerfora capital, o ithe infos chine, Unless on a presntent“o¢ indictment of a gf. No be deprived of Ie, hberty ar pert, wit doe process ot law...” 5 . ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Ter BRYANT CALLOWAY, Petitioner, . v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals ; For the Third Circuit eS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OT eee Petitioner Bryant Calloway respectfully requests that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in this case. ) RECEIVED DEC 21 7673 FES OES ioe ettot-the Case. __ Lys cose presents on patter ouecton ylnether ___Desipiy eine Tne. q(ond pty, thas thefoedamenfal__ | Heitnest oF tne of welotion fi Ta a ee ——— | paseel.oa she divedpe ceptions.of Thomas “ValdeGuilfaid, — ne | ho presertted hunset0s an_all_Kaowing one omai peeent—— __ | vines batall-the players.10_aed activites ofthe Competing > — lig cgi Hen lt ti avd —_ | nnyactions anol the Victims mule in Poctiolot Cul) — Jetted he se vovis-thingsHon us bathe’ slop : | path shea cide Playgidf-he su. _— | Ine old eel 0 dg Ae oly LL sec put_ Ik he Saws me cate the Ployglasd. Hom | D sahedc-ettec. foal), a’ heatag mult ak chi | ile som me tatty bleg2 gus Fmt Po eyes-iathme. He alo , _ testified teat L confided in_hin bolo motive beete hooting anol Cuilfald wos bid lot the time of tal buthod bnted visa wheathe events _ orulted. lobe hebing the tll cig. oleate loot. me | Nor A013, which reivtted ia me beg shot mony time, [lid led. to. corpiciigb ue eo cud _—_ aiding ord dectting use ot aKteorm, 2 tT wos also identfed asthe shoe bebrethe gtond iy based on hearsay estienn ef Fhe_fval dig deoker anda compilation of law enforcement OP cers 4 : (ra\furdls resin Was Pef\ulies onel incrediide. before | bat We qyond ond peht \uries. (Much oF his trial testimony diFreed | ftom prior statements . he made to the grand jury. The veel leshiun was nov a aifent releseh 0 Flaw i mara, @ mine iNconsistency ora mere dscepary tim his gfond ly ‘estiewy Tcl, he ws? fei nied moking on ot the “inconsistent siements, 1S yew! Tess and cortesonal testr mon) did not change. from +he gtard uy to trial, even Thegh two trial wits rade clear thot his offre Testionay was false, A new eyewitness who fled trom the shots, as well as on eer in stile mol idemficokion who callecred evidere fom the-Scene. ond testified, ola bullet ery establ