No. 23-6734

C. Holmes v. Anne Milgram, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal appellate-review article-iii certification certification-of-appeal civil-procedure de-novo-review judicial-procedure standing stay substantial-rights
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-06-20 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower appellate court misapprehends appealability and/or overlooks the request and denial in the district court for certification of appeal and motion for stay pending appeal of denial of substantial rights incapable of vindication on appeal

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the lower appellate court misapprehends appealability and/or _ overlooks the request arid denial in the district court for certification of appeal and ; motion for stay pending appeal of denial of substantial rights incapable of vindication on appeal. 2. Whether denial of the substantial right of de novo determination by Article II! . + Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters, hereafter coerced R&R, impermissibly denies/diminishes substantial rights including but not limited to, judicial review through change in the standard of review with R&R and/or diminished time to file objections/appeal of R&R with potential loss of full, fair, and meaningful review if deemed untimely.

Docket Entries

2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-30
Petitioner complied with order of March 18, 2024.
2024-05-13
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-04-17
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-12
Application (23A915) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 7, 2024.
2024-03-27
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-03-27
Application (23A915) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of March 18, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2024-03-18
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 8, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Party to respond filed.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2024)

Attorneys

C. Holmes
C. Holmes — Petitioner
C. Holmes — Petitioner
Federal Party
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent