Whether the court of appeals erred in denying petitioner's motion to recall its mandate when petitioner has demonstrated actual innocence or a change in law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Should #he Court of opens recall iS mondoke denying Petitioners _ BPPLiCatTON or @ Corkificake OF OPPealability (COA) when Petitioner HOS demonstvoked actual innocence in light oF the new evidence Presented in his § 2255 mokion.or 0 change in law ? ; _ 2. Should the Courk oF appents vecall iks mandate denying Petitioner's ; — __.eplicokion for & COA when Petitioner has shown that 0 frondulenk Conduct Was Carried out by the district Court in order to Serve AS biased and Unjust Opinion thok there exisked no acdual Conflict . . OF inkeresk in this cose ? i