No. 23-6740
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-rights counsel-presence criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment miranda-v-arizona miranda-warning right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Miranda require that a person subjected to custodial interrogation be informed of his right to invoke the presence of counsel during questioning?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Does Miranda require that a person subjected to custodial interrogation be informed of his right to invoke the presence of counsel during questioning? 1
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
2024-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2024)
2023-11-30
Application (23A492) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 9, 2024.
2023-11-20
Application (23A492) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 11, 2023 to February 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Arizona
Amy S. Pignatella Cain — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Amy S. Pignatella Cain — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
George Willie Rios
David Joseph Euchner — Pima County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
David Joseph Euchner — Pima County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner