No. 23-6748
Eric Lavell Minter v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof circuit-court-review civil-rights clear-error-standard criminal-enterprise criminal-procedure due-process evidence fact-based-enhancement managerial-role sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must a district court find that a defendant exercised control over another participant in a criminal enterprise before considering a managerial-role sentencing enhancement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Must a district court find that a defendant exercised control over another participant in a criminal enterprise before considering a managerialrole sentencing enhancement? Must a circuit court conduct fresh review of the sufficiency of evidence at sentencing to support a factbased sentencing enhancement before deferring to the district court’s factual findings under the clear-error standard?
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2024)
2023-12-14
Application (23A547) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 9, 2024.
2023-12-12
Application (23A547) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2023 to February 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Eric Lavell Minter
Andrew Stuart Pollis — Milton and Charlotte Kramer Law Clinic, Petitioner
Andrew Stuart Pollis — Milton and Charlotte Kramer Law Clinic, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent