No. 23-6756

Kenneth J. Coleman v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: competency-hearing confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-competency pate-v-robinson plea-agreement
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the petitioner constitutionally entitled to a hearing upon the issue of his competency to stand trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1). Is the petitioner constitutionally entitled to a hearing upon the issue of his competency to stand trial. 2). Was the petitioner tried, convicted and sentenced while incompetent. 3). Did the prosecution's reading of a codefendant's plea agreement to the jury containing : incriminating and inculpatory statements imputed to the witness but not admitted by the witness deny the petitioner's constitutional right to confrontation. 4). Whethr the reading of a co defendant's facially incriminating plea agreement to the jury without a limiting instruction was constitutional error. 5). Whether appellate counsel's failure to raise a "Pate" claim on behalf of the petitonr, constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel. .

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)

Attorneys

Kenneth J. Coleman
Kenneth J. Coleman — Petitioner
Kenneth J. Coleman — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent