Did the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit fail to consider the effect the combination of the relevant attributes of Mr. Hannold's diagnoses of Impulse-Control-Disorder, Conduct-Disorder, and Antisocial-Personality-Disorder along with the absence of Mr. Hannold's acting 'custodian

No question identified. : QUESTION(S) RELIED UPON FOR ALLOWANCE OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI Ground I. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit fail to consider the effect the combination of the relevant attributes of Mr. Hannold's diagnoses of Impulse Control Disorder, Conduct Disorder, and Antisocial Personality Disorder along with the absence of Mr. Hannold's acting "custodian", his father and the egregious breach of duty from Attorney Lopresti had on Mr. Hannold's ability to file a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition which culminated in an unreasonable application of the equitable tolling doctrine thereby denying Due Process of Law as a matter of first impression? PARTIES The Petitioner in the above captioned matter is Mr. Ethan Andrew Hannold, (Mr. Hannold), Pro Se, who is currently incarcerated within the State Correctional Institution at Albion, at 10745 Rt. 18, Albion, PA 16475-0001. Respondent in the above captioned matter is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who is represented by Drew Welsh, Esq., District Attorney for the Clarion County Court of Common Pleas whose office is located at 502 Liberty Street, Clarion, PA 16214-1113. 2 Ref: 4749105 pg 11 of 39 for BTHAN HANNOKD oo we