Did the United States District Court and Court of Appeals properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022)]

No question identified. : QUESTION(s) PROPOSED Mr. Redfearn respectfully asks: 1. “Did the United States District Court and Court of Appeals properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022), when adjudicating my Habeas Petition?” 1 2. “When the United States District Court and Court of Appeals violate the Fifth, Sixth, Ninth or Fourteenth Amendment(s) by failing to properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022)), when adjudicating my Habeas Petition?” ! i ' Reminding this Great and Honorable Court, while the jury was not in the room, the prosecution played a voice mail from the victim stating that she wanted and demanded to testify in the trial, therefore both of our rights were violated. ii