No. 23-6780
George A. Teacherson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitutional-interpretation declaration-of-independence due-process founding-documents judicial-review legal-hermeneutics originalism textual-analysis
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must any court fully address the actual wording of the founding documents, originalism of Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States, if still in force, when the entire case is based upon exactly such specific original wording and nothing else?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED: Must any court fully address the actual wording of the founding documents, originalism of Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States, if still in force, when the entire case is based upon exactly such specific original wording and nothing else? 2
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-03-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
2024-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent