No. 23-6785
Raleigh G. Rogers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure class-action class-actions contact-information due-diligence due-process notice opt-out rule-23 service-by-publication service-of-process
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it Substantial Harm to the Public to allow the Defendant in a Rule 23(b)(3) 'opt-out' class actions to withhold contact information it maintains in its possession from the Court empowered to adjudicate the class action until after the 150-day 'opt-out' period has expired?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1, Is it Substantial Harm to the Public to allow the Defendant in a Rule : 23(b)(3) “opt-out” class actions to withhold contact information it maintains in its possession from the Court empowered to adjudicate the class action until after the 150-day “opt-out” period has expired? ii
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Bradley Reid Kutrow — McGuireWoods LLP, Respondent
Bradley Reid Kutrow — McGuireWoods LLP, Respondent