Whether an indigent pro se defendant in a state criminal case who is prohibited by state law from raising any claim of trial court error on direct appeal, but who has a state-law right to raise such a claim in a reconsideration proceeding, has a federal constitutional right to the assistance of court-appointed standby trial counsel and court-appointed appellate counsel specifically with respect to his trial court error claim

Questions PRESENTED WHETHER Ol, MWHOCEMT asa Marre of STHTE /a W)) acrval and -acrval/ WMI OCENIT, /MDIgEMT feosE DekupauT in & STATE Ceimmal Case bio 1S PpkonibiTED aN ADEOVATE LVRST POSTCONUIC TION counsel, buT wito ts DE /URE POLLED 7d RAISE Wet lecrivE assistance oF vein! COUNSE! TA SECOND IN'TICS CoslaTeeal REVIEW) PEDCEED Ings Por His ptocebukal Defaults 7o be EX forced VAL -eoeen | COVERT, THE PkoCEDvRA| SCHEME 77AT DE Sacro beces Dep DaUT 70 Rals—E WEFPFETWE LSSISTANCE of 7rie/ Course! C/AIMS til PoSTEONUICTION PROCEEDINGS UITHOUT THE WSSISTAVLE OF COMPETENT Counsel LS WIQDEOUATE AMD DISCRIMMATES LZAINST HS SIKTH AMEdMEvT Right 70 AN ChecTive Teal aTroRMEey by fai litg 70 athoen Hil & RASOMLIE OPPORTU Ty 70 EVER Criellenge His TRA! KTTORMEYS! PEFFRUACE, . WHETHER aM, IWNOGHT 2S OMATTER of STATE lay, acTeal aww Jacvva/ MINOCENT, IMDIQENT Pk0 SE De daUT fd a STATE CRIMINA! CASE WHO Ls pronibirEe by srare law) Feora raising on DieEecT appeal Any Claie of Teal CovrT ERROR, bUT WHo Has a SmRTE-law LigHT 70 RAISE SUCH A CIAIM IQ RECONSIDERATION PROCEED 11g y Hes a feoeeal comsrire7iona RigHT 70 PTWE ASSISTANCE of COURT LETRINED svaudby 77e/a/ Counse/, avd CovrkT a PPUwTED appellate Counse/ Spec ty cally wT LES PZT TO 40S TRIA/ CovRT EGRROL CLAIM « | | il |