Did the state courts deprive the petitioner of due-process, property-rights, constitutional-rights, statutory-rights, full-and-fair-trial, boundary-determination

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . I. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Peti. tioner of Liberty, Due Process of Law, United States Constitutional Rights, Minnesota Constitutional Rights, and Statutory Rights to Determine ~ ° oo Boundaries and Title to certain Land? , me , II. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Peti° : tioner from ever having a Full and Fair Trial by Jury under Minn. Statutes 559.23-25 and Minn. Statutes 541.02, while the action is ripe, by having the complaint hereby Dismissed with Prejudice? III. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Petitioner of property by rejecting the 60 years old (North-South) line as shown to be the true boundary line, on the face of the earth, according to the ArcGIS Web Map, as compiled by the Federal Bureau of Land Management? ii RELATED CASES In re the Matter of the Application of Gene Rechizigel, Pro Se, To Determine Boundary and Title to Certain Land. State of Minnesota in Supreme Court, Docket #: A23-0790. Order denying review entered on September 19, 2023. In re the Matter of the Application of Gene Rechizigel, Pro Se, To Determine Boundary and Title to Certain Land. State of Minnesota in Court of Appeals, Docket #: A23-0790. Final judgment entered on June 27, 2023. In re the Matter of the Application of Gene Rechizigel, Pro Se, To Determine Boundary and Title to Certain Land. State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Docket #: 02-CV-214908. Final judgment entered on March 30, 2023.