No. 23-6798

Qaya Mikel Gordon v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: congressional-power constitutional-authority due-process indian-affairs major-crimes-act native-nations tribal-sovereignty trust-obligations
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by enacting the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §1153, as applied to crimes committed by Indians against Indians on tribal land, without the consent of the tribes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by enacting the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §1153, as applied to crimes committed by Indians against Indians on tribal land, without the consent of the tribes. 2. Whether the legal standard of review, under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, for legislation affecting Indians includes consideration of Congress’ stated purpose behind the legislation and consideration of whether the legislation conforms to the trust obligations toward Native nations. ii RULE 14.1(B)(iii) STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States District Court (D. Idaho): United States v. Gordon, No. 3:21-CR-00305-DCN (Dec. 1, 2022). United States Court of Appeals (9"" Cir.): United States v. Gordon, No. 22-30198 (Nov. 20, 2023).

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-17

Attorneys

Qaya Gordon
Sandy BaggettSandy Baggett, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Sandy BaggettSandy Baggett, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent