Ineffective-Assistance-of-Counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the federal court's ruling on Mosley's Ineffective _ Assistance of Counsel claim deny Mosley equal protection where the court had Before it an evidentiary record to support Mosley's claim, but ignored it? ; 2. Was defense counsel Ineffective in his pretrial, trial and, : post trial conduct? The investigative phase, trial phase and, post conviction assistance. This, in violation of the peti; tioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights under the United States Constitution. : : : 3. Should the federal court have allowed the claims designated : C(1) C(6) E(1) and E(2) to be viewed on their merits as, it was the erred ruling of the state court which caused the : alleged default of the claims? ; ; 4. Did the federal court ruling on Mosley's Trial Court's Abuse of Discretion claim, deny Mosley's equal Protection and . Due © eee : . ; Process rights? The evidentiary record does show that the trial court's conclusion that pro se motion and counsel's motion were not the same in content 48; pro se motion did ; ' include claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Police Mis—tosecutorial Misconduct Police Mis~ conduct. Not allowing an argument for the record on said claims is the reason for claim of Court Abuse of Discretion. i. . wo, | : . A So