Does the Supreme Court of Virginia's refusal to review the State Corporation Commission's (SCC) alleged introduction of fraudulent evidence and its premature closure of a complaint without issuing a cognizable, appealable order—actions claimed to deprive the petitioner of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment—an exceptional circumstance that warrants the intervention and review of this Court, given the potential for significant jurisdictional and constitutional implications?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does the Supreme Court of Virginia's refusal to review the State Corporation Commission's (SCC) alleged introduction of fraudulent evidence and its premature closure of a complaint without issuing a cognizable, appealable order—actions claimed to deprive the petitioner of due process under the Fourteenth an exceptional circumstance that warrants the intervention and review of this Court, given the potential for significant jurisdictional and constitutional implications? ,