No. 23-6818
Romeo Kevante Pride v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-sentencing due-process eighth-amendment sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying Mr. Pride's argument that the District Court committed reversible error by imposing a 110 month sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. PRIDE’S ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A 110 MONTH SENTENCE. i
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2024)
Attorneys
Romeo Kevante Pride
James Edward Yeager Jr. — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
James Edward Yeager Jr. — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent