No. 23-6818
Romeo Kevante Pride v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-sentencing due-process eighth-amendment sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. PRIDE'S ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A 110 MONTH SENTENCE.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying Mr. Pride's argument that the District Court committed reversible error by imposing a 110 month sentence
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2024)
Attorneys
Romeo Kevante Pride
James Edward Yeager Jr. — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent