Did the Ninth Circuit incorrectly affirm the district court's procedural error determining racketeering conduct was reasonably foreseeable under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines to Mr. Carcamo based on his mere membership in a gang?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the Ninth Circuit incorrectly affirm the district court’s procedural error determining racketeering conduct was reasonably foreseeable under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines to Mr. Carcamo based on his mere membership in a gang? 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied this Court’s precedent on reviewing sentences for procedural error when it found the district court’s erroneous Sentencing Guideline calculation was harmless because it would not have impacted the ultimate Guidelines range, instead of assessing whether it would have impacted the ultimate sentence imposed? i INTERESTED