No. 23-6824
Jeremiah James Lynch v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment parole proportionality sentencing sentencing-guidelines supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the application of a 'grade A' violation for a local crime, which resulted in the petitioner receiving more than his original sentence, including an additional period of supervised release
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ay . . 16 IT @ Constituriona) Violation To apply a grade, “A” violation Loca Crome the Srate Aid NOT wader oF PONeue, Furthermore. Movauny, Recewed Mele me Than Wis origional Sentence SY, Ia Months in OTVSO"\ amd av addivtienal pesicck ov Supesvised rereaso, é
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-04-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent