Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) WAS THE LOWER COURTS WRONG FOR NOT EXCEPTING THE ATTACHMENTS THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION TO STATE CLAIMS IN MORE DETAIL? co, ; . 2) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRESION WHEN THEY DENIED PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR A RHINE V. WEBER STAY WHEN DIXON V. BAKER CHANGE THE LAW WHEN > POST CONVICTED WITH OUT COINSFLOR? , 3) WAS THE DISTRICT COURT WRONG FOR RECHARACTERIZING PETITIONER'S 60(b)(6) : MOTION TO BE A 60!lb)(1) MOTION TO FIT THE CRITERIA FOR lyr. TIME RESTRICTIONS FOR DENTAL? ne oO 4) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS DISGRESION BY IGNORING ‘THE PRESENTS SET BY DIXON V. BAKER (9th CIR. 2017.) WHEN LAWS CHANGE TO OBTAIN A RHINES STAY? me 5) DID THE DISTRICT COURT IGNORE PRESENTS WHEN SET IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, IN SLACK V. MCDANIELS RULING ON SECOND OR SUCESSIVE PETITIONS WHEN THE PETITION WAS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE? Se LISTOF PARTIES . [X] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of : all