Whether an off-duty officer qualifies for qualified-immunity

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Whobhor Lhe pfasen! tase of Lavens vs Gaspard invdlvas violation OF Yaw Nth “Amandmony. Rights. } A. \Whelher on off duty Of fieor shill Qualifies for. Qualified immunity, 5, Wholhor or not if Dufendant used aovascive Loree. 7 UW. Wha was the faced thal a werkln vloborized affidavit Som, rasourank wre Spi Veal Dafondon' Devlor Caaspard choking, Plantitt and: calling amit ratial'Slurs was ignored. 5. Why was Plaintiff no} Allowed to ‘Prvss thar gis ogni nst Defondand. lo, Why cid the Lowor Courts assume Plaintifr \Alas drunk whan vidoo widenee Shows Plainbrfr unterig the raskuran} Walking normal and only shows signs OF boing unbalanted cflor bin used ulith sxcessive Forte Hhvough tho, restaurant. doors Oillede +0 Nd pound “Thar wids also No sor ist ‘ask pven 4o or taken by PlainiiFe that stalad Planiff wias iftoticated. . LISTOF PARTIES Man parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. | [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all