No. 23-6842
Reginald Creshawn Doss v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment bruen-test circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process felon-in-possession firearms-regulation second-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-07-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to the defendant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, as the Eighth Circuit held, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (which prohibits any felon from possessing firearms) is invariably constitutional both facially and as applied to any defendant, no matter the case-specific circumstances?! 1 Separate petitions for writ of certiorari were filed on virtually the same issue in Edell Jackson v. United States, 23-6170 and Sylvester Cunningham v. United States, 23-6602. Mr. Doss’s petition only differs in that he also raised a facial challenge under the Second Amendment. il
Docket Entries
2024-08-05
Judgment Issued.
2024-07-02
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-06-24
Supplemental Brief of United States submitted.
2024-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-04-29
Brief of respondent United States filed.
2024-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2024.
2024-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2024 to April 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Reginald Creshawn Doss
Heather Rae Quick — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
Heather Rae Quick — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent