No. 23-6844

In Re Deborah E. Gouch-Onassis

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-02-28
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process equal-protection qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-06-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing petitioner's civil rights claims for lack of standing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : «LSB Sapa Coa gall at) 3 Supone lout Eercionw RP Cupane Leak Coldpunn oe 3 Sih Cain ling . Edmund D,Qlan Claldun Cou , — Btkle | Lsstizas faunal i $00 Onaplis Canty Bele. , Le shfalin lalenedy "Ne, Cobhens is notin He CALL Syste, POP Sake, Bohs 20 | Sabana; CH F890! | Deluna, CAO 1 Mottin Pouk, CA RVTEF Eg Aumont ' | vo boelcoop ~~ : ; oe ealledee Stew Vth ust us 25 Alls € Sail 2.99, \W SarteCl & gAbo 2 Son (hie, CA 9513 —> ofan Coal focma od ‘Wateg Verran | 4 “|dedvad Rule op Cuwilfoenlon Poke Rumson dor Laslig tan Md ; ertieses% Wood bhondine ond South. | | 3 She. dee on usheah Catipounieo Anpen j fF Ppmang toa an Baths enoi : | eclad Kile gloved fruadon. . cdeobial Kile 60 Cb) “Jucad sapengrd west fe eras and ahead Sera su Daly, Sly hdia, “got uno mpeg aaith apes nen = Maun abs a Nt pe “ak > tld kF your Whom far Auk Yoo” © faa §.'btit op anaes ieee aera i i doa pl | ee Te pad ead ° in GA Aout, fe lingeles She, \s its aay. Cay sod F,raporl, Yoo “Iu ld ae BE mf “Telia Oaks oy ets C020 * " Banbnek. | Pad sopshen 0b eg bla (AL, ef0HD , 00 thd Uhy wer Batis) “Wipe bud te elder fo Be Oe a esas Aime pt 6 gh sent #0 Pe Hou) .008. “Lah Lp-zme with /20 2reaey Bnd hdd a» [US (bamy ada cussion 0 gel De. a i age Id “dag ge mone Conte 28 t ° ye pelea that Doano unt ancl Bor LC Noled pod Prtut | Lopears Leste tp 9 Meaasng Peas 4 Bittle, blinads 10 ‘WGuot a0 myAb husidard No.2 wef Lua cAeteel Pod Lely en xb ahad “Wo Lent! Thy rt » Gf Allipoin flows me vn ypidout pom * | pfoo tneclebp.or Cnuct and Visor ‘ find de i 4 Crild he co she ya Ae wasald ty dit » he dunce wap spa dual ai Uf took 2 Yeon, L aont po Lepealy = [homer ana tirally Leknaas pene = ae was Leppediin ibs) ; Hight fo oO hom ZEOCRA "| As Ato Jone D, Weal, My Cate EEE PN Le mei ; is inal dip A Moat Eee oc gay es ao 8 | ada ct Serbs TL OLTAGOA puckoq Moun No bthe : lowing gn : Sono fbelvone beh : Od VY MAbdrldac : vil seni | «| Patina bequest hat Pas Core fe Dyn vad foe Gorousten of my howd fhe rp pe ns dun +0 W cane ; Fett a lene ee . ORCL Blow 0d ea (Panga DCES 2 chon pel raza gotten boele oa MY Ne pha . 1. ae idan nagach ae 26 90 if Quek Aygtith Yeah Chaoas “| lh, u van , Nic nythe Slate o Cabjouse o eer dhe Rub 23.1 “) sk hae bt 7 [Coroins baotlan 30 Rays, pydluoune he LO | Mak Heise sthitandcbnd : dan: 18 Cpnuany » pal ad andate, W once "gle Waa Sik Mahe OE ads “19 hott te tad Pl . penatty BL peyny Une bleténg ss he i llega ont = |Ouppaede fm on [| ~fuith clus ullragnee and Monwaty, Rototone, . dhe. Cian Wrslheodt Oday fo Fe Annet Se San 2) bao fo Vinay Ui ocbad damste. Prfune : dus tha dad Coreen : Created ¢. 18 Qanuary 900% Fisprot, folly, 19 , ; | 20 ‘ uf ‘ | a [2 ti he d Orden Water ; had te Laws 2 the ab: : : Vaclthe fpttsorng b inode : UW caute dé 18 Qanuory 20049 my : bere emacs ws] Cobelvotey by Duprome. * | Cynon FROP COG FRCPC) "| Gbosicea « \SVenvou 2024 Popul,

Docket Entries

2024-06-17
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-05-28
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-04-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-02-23
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Deborah E. Gouch-Onassis
Deborah Elizabeth Gouch-Onassis — Petitioner