Whether the Courts below determination that the witnesses Identification was not unduly suggestive, was contrary to clearly established Federal Taw §28 usc 2254[d][1][2] U.S. Const. Amend. 14

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ ; 1. Whether the Courts below determination that the witnesses Identification was not unduly suggestive, was contrary to clearly established Federal Taw §28 usc 2254[d][1][2] U.S. Const. Amend. 14 : : 2.Whether the District Court committed error by ruling on petitioner's State appeal, Instead of the issues and arguments raised in petitioner's Habeas petition L :