Whether the inclusive evidence of documentation presented upon three (3) separate and distinct occasions arriving from three (3) separate and distinct applications of national education origin as well as three (3) separate and distinct educational governmental agencies involvement; documenting intentional purposeful grade fraud imposed upon the innocent Indigenous American Black children obstructs the American public educational system as well as the nexus designed to impede the progression of exposure for all governmental agencies, nongovernmental agencies and individuals involved; hence, upholding a R.I.C.O. criminal syndicate that intentionally interrupts, manipulates, and proports commerce in the United States of America?

QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Whether the inclusive evidence of documentation presented upon three (3) separate and distinct occasions arriving from three (3) separate and distinct applications of national education origin as well as three (3) separate and distinct educational governmental agencies involvement; documenting intentional purposeful grade fraud imposed upon the innocent Indigenous American Black children obstructs the American public educational system as well as the nexus designed to impede the progression of exposure for all governmental agencies, nongovernmental agencies and individuals involved; hence, upholding a R.I.C.O. criminal syndicate that intentionally interrupts, manipulates, and proports commerce in the United States of America? ; Mf Mit It 2) Whether Brown vs. Board of Education should be reversed, and the Indigenous American Black citizens be permitted to exercise free authority over the implementation and authority over their own public educational design as well as system with separate but equal standing in federal, state, and local funding for a new identity classification inclusive in full legal standing for the United States of America? Mt : . Ut Mf : 3) Whether governmental and non-governmental R.I.C.O. syndicate shadow agencies and shadow individuals be permitted to freely exercise authority over the educational equitable benefits of Indigenous Black American children where there is evidence of the application of masterful intent to impose systematic racist forms of thought, intentional design of inequity, and optimal production of educational disparaged applicants according to a shadow unconstitutional governance for purposes of creating a cultural decline of participation within the commerce of the America? Mi Il Mt ; ; 4) Whether the word “NIGGER” should be reclassified as Hate Speech and not protected under the Free Speech First Amendment of the Unites States Constitution? 4 INTRODUCTION TO QUESTION PRESENTED The 14 Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, Title VI of the Civil Right Act and 1%* Amendment Freedom of Speech Violations. The violations involved the ‘conditioning’ of black students to ‘accept’ a less than demeaning perspective towards their personhood, identity, cultural influence, designation, and presentation to ‘others’. The ‘presentation’ of a NIGGER. The ‘conditioning’ of a NIGGER. This is the current expectation within the curriculum and social fabric of