No. 23-6877
Omar S. Folk v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amended-complaint certiorari-finality civil-procedure district-court-dismissal due-process procedural-error standing summary-affirmance third-circuit-error third-circuit-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-04-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit Erred in Summarily Affirmed District Court Dismissal on Plaintiff's Third Amend Complaint Doc. 196 before his original Cert. was final in Supreme Court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Third Circuit Erred in Summarily Affirmed District Court Dismissal on Plaintiff's Third Amend Complaint Doc. 196 before his original Cert. was final in Supreme Court? 2. Whether the Third Circuit Erred in Summarily Affirmed District Court Not Addressing Doc. 197 Motion For Leave A "COM" before his original Gert. was Final in Supreme Court? Joa : 02/05/2024 PARTIES TO PROCEEDING The
Docket Entries
2024-04-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2024-04-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)
Attorneys
Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent