No. 23-6884
Alexander Yoichi Duberek v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-review standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors? i ; Public Copy-Sealed Materials Redacted
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-04
Motion (23M64) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2024-02-14
MOTION (23M64) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-08
Motion (23M64) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2024-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent