No. 23-6890

Lamar Larue White v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-material constitutional-rights dna-evidence due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions lesser-included-offense sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Jury-instructions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i 1.) Wherefore, in this matter is it legally permissible to ‘eonviet ‘the accused on erroneous jury instructions that do not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the elements are not proven,and, . (A.) the violation of due process by the lower court's : duty to instruct the jury sua sponte of a lesser ; included offense? , 2.) Wherefore, does the constitution protect an accused from a miscarriage of justice where impeaching evidence is lossed, or destroyed pertaining to DNA and Toxicology samples relevant to Brady material?,_ 3.) Does the failures of trial counsel to protect petitioner from wrongful conviction by allowing the proceedings to continue on an illegally impermissible prosecution due the circumstances substantiate a violation’ of the Sixth Amendment? ;

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2024)
2023-11-30
Application (23A491) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 27, 2024.
2023-11-14
Application (23A491) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2023 to January 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Lamar White
Lamar Larue White — Petitioner