No. 23-6890

Lamar Larue White v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-material constitutional-rights dna-evidence due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions lesser-included-offense sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

in this matter is it legally permissible to 1.) Wherefore
. co.nvict the accused on erroneous jury instructions that do
not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the elements
are not proven,and,
(A.) the violation of due process by the lower court's
duty to instruct the jury sua sponte of a lesser
included offense?

2.) Wherefore, does the constitution prot'ect an accused
from a miscarriage of justice where impeaching evidence
is lossed, or destroyed pertaining to DNA and Toxicology
samples relevant to Brady material?

3.) Does the failures of trial counsel to protect petitioner
from wrongful conviction by allowing the proceedings to
continue on an illegally impermissible prosecution due
the circumstances substantiate a violation 1of the Sixth
Amendment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Jury-instructions

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2024)
2023-11-30
Application (23A491) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 27, 2024.
2023-11-14
Application (23A491) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2023 to January 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Lamar White
Lamar Larue White — Petitioner