No. 23-6895

Bradley Lane Croft v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-law fraud identity-theft qualifications statutory-interpretation united-states-v-dubin
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-03-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether aggravated identity theft convictions must be reversed when the real 'crux' of the fraud turns, not on any person's name, but on their qualifications

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether aggravated identity theft convictions must be reversed when the real “crux” of the fraud turns, not on any person’s name, but on their qualifications. See United States v. Dubin, 599 U.S. 110 (2023).

Docket Entries

2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Bradley Croft
James Scott SullivanLaw Offices of J. Scott Sullivan, Petitioner
James Scott SullivanLaw Offices of J. Scott Sullivan, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent