No. 23-6902
Jeffrey Akard v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-error plea-bargain procedural-due-process retroactivity sentencing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a U.S. District Court Judge be forced to accept a plea bargain waiver signed in February when the law changed in March?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED wee 1. Shovid a US. District Court Tidge CAForce a. pi Coree Men aodpeal Waiize ‘oned in Feb. hes ar Sate ‘ dhe la 4 Made G2) ror t US. on NCLAG wyilef ti ? eS — eS Zz. Zs the Use of Ga Extrnording Vala hkcit (Coram WMob/s) plopec. i a. plea coment Gppbal Water ek pires once the C1tTtHACe Chal Or Is QUAA nialia eee eee eee Eee meee wee eee eee Eee SSS a Eee A eee , i Bee eee NCCF #M1 (Rev. 1128/23)
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent