Whether the trial court erred by finding that a statutory requirement that former offenders must pay $31.25 did not constitute an ex post facto violation, where the offense took place prior to the enactment of the statute requiring payment

Question Presented 3 Whether the trial court erred by finding that a statutory requirement that former offenders must pay $31.25 did not constitute an ex post facto violation, where the offense took place prior to the enactment of the statute requiring payment. The question is shown in the trial court judgment, R-10, with the trial court determination shown at R-11. 1.0 20-Dec-2023 pagei tmac.ta3: base(3.0k, 30-Jun-2023); legal(3.0v, 28-Jul-2022); app(3.0, 29-Jun-2009); cite(3.1a, 23-Feb-2014) y Albright v. Roberts 2023EJ pet. cert.