No. 23-6908
Shawn Christy v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-procedure criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judgment-of-acquittal judicial-discretion judicial-error pro-se right-to-counsel self-representation sentencing-review
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court error in not permitting Mr. Christy to represent himself?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the district court error in not permitting Mr. Christy to represent himself? Suggested Answer: Yes. 2. Did the district court error in not granting the defendant’s motion for judgement of acquittal and/or motion for a new trial? Suggested Answer: Yes. 3. Was the defendant’s sentence harsh and excessive? Suggested Answer: Yes. 4. Did the Court of Appeals error in not recusing Judge Bibas? Suggested Answer: Yes. ;
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent