Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in concluding that Petitioner's claims were constitutionally barred by the Eleventh Amendment

No question identified. : 1. Queshon Patsen tel, How is the Eleveoth recut Appeal Cough able Zo Clam igsuz3 Raiseol by Pelrhoner l8S wol ConSiitulional y'bhshad! piped HE Lond eutel fhe thunted EAE Cash bobo blabes Ahly? j . Il. Zit af Lowteatds , 1). QcteSlinnd Patstaled. 2.202 i . |W). _zable of Mulhaerhies. e. hiieiv DY) GeutedtS Below... 52. ee eel WY), MsRiSdrvchindecre cece oat VE) Conohtubonal Peovissaats zasvolvtc/eocsecee ehh WW), Shebewtell af Me CIE versace eee 5 ; TK). Reasons Ae geal) wethecececese4id %), MI), Apes... oo N92L ; 1, Céleventh Lire Oeclta) 2p9..cesesere! 2. { famed Radben warranh Winer , AqgPavatecl Assadl wWaerand Jervree e000 416 5 Cedille) 2 p9.cccee cect ee ee | so ( Athidevit feone suese $4 “Sleawa D. Thompson” step bacther, Petibonee Aest Lots! Chik les Sh jtial WARE, Mt). occ evo e th8 6. (Appellate Cause! frtlee8 ke spouclitg fo fabsbanee on Sted 183288) Lethe JIatid Monch 13,2016 £p9; leer dated August 25, 201s Lpq-; leer doled Ocfobee 14, 2019; Lelbex doled pecenber 7 LOG see wenn eed 4. (wolow Ze leave Fo Faoetin| tu Foes PULMLRIS) ooo es + 99 27 | RAM aS ef | Declines tod vd Sippel of rile! fog ltt ¢o feocted — Mel okt FRLUPERIS) or 0 on p9 28> 3% , Hy | THT. Zable of Anthoates Eases Eguilee wv. Zeuas, 378 U.S, 108, 112, 0.3, 8Y sc 1909, 12 £.td. 2d 128 (196 Vocevveese & banks v. thniked Stabes, 920 f. supp 688 (ED. VA. 1996).20006 10 Litem Vv Staley 16 ba, 55%, 562 (YZ Sb. 19E) (1902). .00 cee Caglal Dutarbulng (o. y. slale, 86 bape. 303, 306 (43 3t, 2d 167) 1961).. eves ceee J Gofielal v. Stale, 247 Ga. 98,109 (6) (274 5.2. 2ol F50)(1983) ...00-00 06 DeMerto v. Ute doles, 128 EF. Lol 1074 (11** erg. 1 )eonsneae ee ID pewter vy. Shoht, G23 38, Leb 160 AWB) rceces Fleteee v, State, °57 Ge. Ape. 767, 08 (278 5-2. 444) (1981) ,,.0.00600F Broadwell y. Morted Babes, 357 2/5. 180, 186, 18 3.cb. 1245 2 2, bl 2d 1503 CHB )eroesevve. G Hewdeeson Vv. Hamer, 287 Ga. $34(697 3.2. 2of 198) (2010).0.200.7 datkson v, Wega, 493 US 307, 314, 18 32h. BT8l, Lit. bol. 860 (1979)... ee | Maothed y Shale, 164 Ga. My 627 (1982) sevecerees4 Libel v. shat, 10% ba. 61,62 (96 5.8, 12) (1100.0. oee0ue 1 Sheaed v. Slohe, 200 4a. IT Gbib)..0 0-22 Sunk v. Haedeck, 206 a2. sf (46Y 0-£. 2a 118) 199E)o.csseveee I glabe vi Zbawels, 239 59. 183,986 (238 3.2. 2d BAIT) 00.002 eee 7 Hurbecl Soles v. Apues, 427 8.97, We S.cb. 2392, Yo 2. ed. Lol 342 (111)... rev eesaeld Hated Stales v Seott, 193 4 20/ 1520, 1821-22 CH 218. 1998) encnenacecB ZB US. C.F 1Z5YG) wo