Did the actions/omissions of State agents deny petitioner of meaningful access to the habeas courts, in violation of the 1st and 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendments, and the Christopher v. Harbury holding, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the actions/omissions of State agents deny petitioner of meaningful access to the habeas courts, in violation of the 1st and 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendments, and the Christopher v. Harbury holding, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1)? ; Is petitioner entitled to equitable tolling of the filing constraints of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 for the delay causing actions of state agents? 2. Was the prosecutions use of its peremptory challenges, 7 of the 9 to exclude A frican-Americans discriminatory and in violation of the 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendment, and Batson v. Kentucky holding, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1)? Was the lower courts determination of facts unreasonable in light of the record, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ()?