Whether the State Appellate Court erred in denying the assertion of equitable-estoppel by the petitioner, against a government-entity, which, intentionally-deceived the petitioner for the purpose of denying the petitioner's right to due-process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the State Appellate Court erred in denying the assertion of equitable estoppel by the petitioner, against a government entity, which, intentionally deceived the petitioner for the purpose of denying the petitioner's right to Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment. 2. Whether State Appellate Court erred in finding that, by retaining an attorney, the petitioner was precluded from seeking equitable estoppel against a government entity, which intentionally defrauded the petitioner for the purpose of denying the petitioner’s right to Due Process? 3. Whether the State Appellate court erred in finding a government entity’s constitutional responsibilities and obligations become moot once an opposing party has retained an attorney? 4. Whether a government entity, having intentionally deceived a plaintiff in order to violate their civil rights, is immune from the assertion of equitable estoppel, once the plaintiff has retained counsel. 5. Whether the State Appellate Court erred in failing to address the government entity’s violation of California Government Code section 910.4., which denied petitioner's right to Due Process. 6. Whether the deliberate attempt by a government agency to prevent the exercise of Due Process constitute acts that would effect public interest or policy that justify asserting equitable estoppel is excused once the petitioner has retained an attorney. 2