No. 23-6926

Pidy T. Tiger v. Tommy Williams, Warden

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-precedent federal-indian-law federal-jurisdiction federal-law indian-law jurisdictional-dispute native-american-rights statutory-interpretation treaty-abrogation treaty-interpretation tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the Kansas Act 18 U.S.C. 3243 be read to abrogate the Creek Nation Treaty of 1856?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1. Can the Kansas Act 18 U.S.C. 3243 be read to abrogate the Creek Nation Treaty of 1856? 2. Does Oklahoma.v. McGirt,2020 represent clearly established federal law applicable to all States of the Union?

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Pidy T. Tiger
Pidy T. Tiger — Petitioner
Pidy T. Tiger — Petitioner