Saria Walker v. Scientific Alloys Corp., et al.
Privacy
Is there other safer alternatives now available other than dental amalgam?
No question identified. : QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED 1.) Is there other safer Alternatives now Available other than Dental Amalgam? 2.)ls Mercury a product you would want in your mouth as a citizen ? 3. Did it Occur that if something is toxic to the environment and to the touch and air that it would most indefinitely be toxic in the mouth of citizens ? 4. Is this product being advertised properly to third party consumers who cannot adhere to the label that states its a poison ? 5. Does Mercury cause people to develop the symptoms being advertised in this product for the 5 groups of highrisk individuals such as neurological impairment ect 6. Is this product toxic like LEAD due to similarities of the way it affects citizens’ health and the environment ? 7. Do the Goverment Representatives value money they save using this : product over the health of citizens? 8. Can Government Representatives choose to falsely advertise a product as safe based on their personal feeling which is NOT the law or Constitutional when it's scientifically proven to be toxic to humans and the environment ? 9. ‘Would citizens choose to put this in the mouth of their children or themselves if they could see the label for themselves that has a skull and bones and labeled it as a poison ? . 10.) Would you produce a poisonous toxic product to be put in the mouth of a third party consumer when you know they will not be able to see the label firsthand all for the sake of revenue ? 11.) Would you agree that mercury is harmful not limited to only certain group of population but everyone who comes in contact with mercury ? 12.) Do High Risk population stated in the FDA warnings mean people that are AT HIGH RISK TO show signs of mercury poison ? :