Whether Congress intended the Alternative sex trafficking of children 'OR' by force, fraud, or coercion as Alternative Elements or Alternative Means?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Whether Congress intended the Alternative sex trafficking of children "OR" by force, fraud, or coercion as Alternative Elements or Alternative Means? 2.) Whether Congress intended the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue to be used as a "Catch-All-Net" for an Accuse to be prosecuted for violating the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue, Whether the alleged victim be)Minor(s) or an Adult(s)? If so, does the statue 1591 controdict its' definition and/or recognition of establishment of an minor not being an full legal adult to make free will decision, and under-". mines an adult ability to do the same for its actions? 3.) Whether the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue have multiple statues combined in one statue that controdicts its' statue to be a single offense. If not, what essential element identifies the distintion at ofvan minor vs. an adult whom choose to independently enter-off-into prostitution? 4.) Whether Congress clearly discribed the essential elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or is the statue unconstitutional vague and over-broad. What is the true meaning of statue 18 U.S.C. § 1591?