No. 23-6942

Paulino Granda v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states mandatory-life-sentence mandatory-minimum predicate-conviction sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a petitioner demonstrates a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right warranting a certificate of appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether a Petitioner demonstrates that he has made “a substantial , showing of the denial of a constitutional right” warranting the , issuance of a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and § 2253(c), where the trial court failed to vacate the mandatory life sentence imposed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851, despite the court’s determination that Petitioner, pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 544 U.S. 295 (2005), diligently obtained the vacatur of the state court conviction used as a predicate to impose the mandatory life sentence.

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Paulino Granda
Paulino Granda — Petitioner
Paulino Granda — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent