Whether the DCCA correctly denied the petition for writ of certiorari

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED O kha He DCCA Conect in offering He fecision _ ja ay) ICE Fp titer. Cou Sudge Abn. Merdh M0) Fasicos fF Aimitiig ¢ Compliol agains 2 Far edbraf S-dpe Rey ce C hanbahie Aono erry Ht: Kinnedy Je Cote, 2.01) Leesposle.A) Ove, Vid lation B Fe WCET by being Crenedetlanth, idifcel') tod (ik ng Hi Oley tla, Attine [ve an Osreicy") as yf Ae Y Way Acting if | aprad g Or Meelph Masmen "by cabal ab bedeia) Whee C2,es; Liha Mr Con Jen) phe. i was Sroulp & te eS. wa rect dim Lben. say 2015 ao fefey cofed Auisust 5 20/2 [te ox grec ped by BOF’ awhoy bes elkedes VATAG, Neji Fo Retire end Sectreh bry chead, shy expecieh DZ LAP Y Mb ebm tes / bole bylyyy £ Hérean{ ord Redd UMppbéps BEER. and) DRNEwiirhyy fy murder DexfL/One-tyeq bobbi Wha tah aa wack, Desh/tre bye He Piver hades thus. bleiecg Joe Leccupe he. bathed aS ey Nei ants rRCCA frp), 6 GH At 7 pomig thy Cremaseph) “fe le, aan Cnr Che m VIIG 2top «df 2472 fe re fh Vey Vande, upreign oy Crfucry, holies hime Polbose ov,