No. 23-6949
Jose Salomon Madrid-Paz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting categorical-approach criminal-law federal-crime federal-jurisdiction hobbs-act statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether aiding and abetting is a means of committing a Hobbs Act violation under the categorical approach
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether aiding and abetting is a means of committing a Hobbs Act violation under the categorical approach. 2. Whether conspiracy and attempt are means of committing a Hobbs Act violation under the categorical approach.
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Madrid-Paz
John Riley Friesell — Friesell Westerlage, PLLC, Petitioner
John Riley Friesell — Friesell Westerlage, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent