Was Mr. Kissner's state and federal constitutional rights to effective assistance of appointed appellate counsel violated?

No question identified. : QUEST ZONS PRESENTED WAS MR. KISSNERS STATEAND FEDERAL COMSTZTUTIONAL BLGHTS 70 EFF ECTLVE Con STANCE OF APPOINTED APPELLATE yy El. WHERE THE WAS A BREAKDOWN COMMUNEICATLION ANP DIVESTIED MR. BISSNER OF THE BLGHT TO (ELLE A STANDARD — Y SUPPLEMENTAL, BRLEF PURSUANT TO ADMINESTRATLVE ORDER 2004-@3 77 IEW x) L20cu)? WAS MR .YLSSNER'S STATE AND FEPERAL COMSTZTUTZONAL ALveH7 TO PRESENT A VALZD DEFENSE OF DE MLVESHED CAFACEIY WHI WweUulD NEGATE THE 70 THE ACT COMAILITED WAS MR, KESSNER'S STATE AND FEDE&AL. CONMSTLTUTEONAL PLGHTS TO PESEO VERY AND PRODUCTION EF DecuMENTZ> VIOLATED? — / —_ TAELE OF COPSTENTS QUESTZOMS PRESENTED» 6 6 6 sO