No. 23-6955
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel appellate-procedure civil-rights communication-breakdown constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review right-to-counsel right-to-present-defense
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS MR. KISSNERS STATE AND FEDERAL
COMSTZTUTIONAL BLGHTS 70 EFF ECTLVE
Con STANCE OF APPOINTED APPELLATE
yy El. WHERE THE WAS A BREAKDOWN
COMMUNEICATLION ANP DIVESTIED MR.
BISSNER OF THE BLGHT TO (ELLE A STANDARD —
Y SUPPLEMENTAL, BRLEF PURSUANT TO
ADMINESTRATLVE ORDER 2004-@3 77 IEW
x) L20cu)?
WAS MR .YLSSNER'S STATE AND FEPERAL
COMSTZTUTZONAL ALveH7 TO PRESENT A
VALZD DEFENSE OF DE MLVESHED CAFACEIY
WHI WweUulD NEGATE THE cCALMIEMNALRESPONSEBLLLTY 70 THE ACT COMAILITED
WAS MR, KESSNER'S STATE AND FEDE&AL.
CONMSTLTUTEONAL PLGHTS TO PESEO VERY
AND PRODUCTION EF DecuMENTZ> VIOLATED?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Kissner's state and federal constitutional rights to effective assistance of appointed appellate counsel violated?
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-02-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Donald Kissner
Donald Lee Kissner — Petitioner