David Wilbanks v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Did the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction over the collateral order doctrine when the district judge failed to issue a COA for the final judgment under Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) that governed the basis for the district court's viewing the CPOE-e examination view filed in the case as a violation of the Confrontation Clause warranted by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Did dhe WWW Cie. Couch af Kppeals Ihave Gunsdichion Ouer the COALcEMicake. of aadeaabildy) when Unstrict luda. Lackeck to isasxe acdend a (COA WA Me Quad Jodamenk under Fed. 2. WV Co) thot Oovern Jasis dD the Wial Coork lou Viewing Ane CPOEK-e KaMNadion Vow filet nse Ac ACtoster, Violated the atromtakiow Cause waveanked bt Abe six Mmondmenk al iss United States Cong storan® — So avd the foucteeMh Amendment © LISTOF PARTIES : If all parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ; all