Jacob Smith v. John Henley, Warden, et al.
X £r*'ifb A^edq-e^ The Trial frosecaiot lia\ fdhcor\cl\idt~
r^i 4w sh>f% fKe Bo/de/n of froofi kr^cj 7W MfSroiiU faM fa
&) y^eee/vf eyfde/\ceprove My innocence, /4rter As foVy Ma/JmHU) TV ice fa
pro^ My Innocence /in front of A 3jury, Then After 3ro/ft\ Ora.(y spoke ai) out
evidence , Tf e Pmecufaf sicf-cd Ttat do e6/\f/We y^r /A/loee/K^,
By The fro5ecc^tor &sk/ 'ng The defendant fa prove your i nnoce/jcfc rri
of A Oary. Ti fals (burden state/ne/ifs ^My f/fljOroper , Xs fKi'5
prcdjucuJtxL CoA-fus:^ fa A zfury? V/as Cou^ei Offset Ve for not
Obj^cfiA^/ronf
^ tsemWAi e the. right fo Pe/oreied AfSelA ® Af Pceli>i«ry Hean'^ The 3y^ig
/tyW WchVn tf€h£ui £ofj/sixs houL^«SS. The ILS, dupreer*
CoarV Ral-ed +K« 6-fouact u/as a/)escauS+ed: flerau-s^ A^V Uojyer added Jhe
%Co-se ( htUrtUtwy OeA is ^ ^Y
£tte Arau^enf /Mirror^ The Onai'v"i Of The couftaeA/cct Me fhe
rtW * '£ #**&*«-*«*. 'w *"'"'
Tne rUjHAr to represent Ay$el£*
M-imilhs Tad for IWW9* oTo/>e/i rWer, The Pro Seculars tipeMj Stademenb To
Ai_+u Phase of tWXary instruct* Q/V> The Prosecutor/nsfracksc^ The :Xury, f\a.r
, .. A tfAd 5^,-rtx nujiy of first jbe^f^ Alurder A^d TW Pre^eddafion So My
The^ f A Wess'Ve Thoughts 0f the ^Ind, fry Jnfty ~fhinking about kaWinj
*< Pre /Wi^K™. Per By ford V. State, /Atvaclo. Has been Warned
n^e ^ -fhflt+zLctfc AtXury iTsfrudfari** froes this Mijfadepenl °f
1° 5 °P 5r^ , « . to otter debtees of /Harder. CTd TV$ instucf/4/iiSX^BS bittrol reasonable JanSr iMd a l^s a 3 hi. , /(,
Whether the prosecutor improperly shifted the burden of proof by asking the defendant to prove his innocence in front of the jury, which was prejudicial and confusing