Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of the same United States Court of Appeals on the same important matter concerning statutory prohibitions as it relates to pro-se-prisoner-litigants

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ’ 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a decision in conflict with the detisionthat same United States Court of Appeals on the same important matter concerning statutory prohibitions as it relates to pro se prisoner litigants’ administrative remedy exhaustions? 2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a : decision in conflict with the decision of another United States Court.of Appeals on the same ; important matter pertaining to statutory prohibtions as it relates to pro se litigants' administrative remedy exhaustions? 3. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has entered a decision in conflict ; with the same U.S. Court of Appeals decision as it pertains to applying the applicable law to pro se litigants irrespective of whether it's mentioned by name? ; 4. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning the provisional authority of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) fashioned by Congress? 5. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning Equal : Protection Rights for similarly situated plaintiffs? 6. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning Stare Decisis applications for precedential case decisions? : . te . LISTOF PARTIES = : All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. i ". RELATED CASES oe 7 Robbins v. Wetzel, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 23101 (3d Cir. Robbins v. Wetzel, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100279, 2023 WL 3901806 (M.D. Pa. June 8, 2023) ;