No. 23-6969
James Paul Antonio v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assault criminal-law dangerous-weapon due-process federal-jurisdiction predicate-offense sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an assault with a dangerous weapon, with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), categorically qualifies as a predicate 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an assault with a dangerous weapon, with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), categorically qualifies as a predicate “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). i
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)
Attorneys
James Paul Antonio
Jeremy Ryan Moore — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Jeremy Ryan Moore — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent