No. 23-6969

James Paul Antonio v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assault criminal-law dangerous-weapon due-process federal-jurisdiction predicate-offense sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an assault with a dangerous weapon, with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), categorically qualifies as a predicate 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an assault with a dangerous weapon, with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), categorically qualifies as a predicate “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). i

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)

Attorneys

James Paul Antonio
Jeremy Ryan MooreFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Jeremy Ryan MooreFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent