No. 23-6976
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure custody eighth-circuit howes-test miranda-custody miranda-rights ninth-circuit supreme-court tenth-circuit terry-stop
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts must apply the second step of Howes to determine if a person is 'in custody' for Miranda purposes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether courts must apply the second step of Howes to determine if a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes. prefix PARTIES,
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-17
Reply of petitioner Juan Cabrera filed. (Distributed)
2024-05-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-04-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 13, 2024.
2024-04-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2024 to May 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Juan Cabrera
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent