No. 23-6980
Matthew Murphy v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bias constitutional-rights fourteenth-amendment guilty-plea prosecutorial-bias recusal sixth-amendment structural-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-this-court-should-grant-this-petition
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether This Court Should Grant This Petition Because The Failure To Exclude The United States District Attorney’s Office For the District of Massachusetts For Bias Violated Mr. Murphy’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights. 2. Whether Mr. Murphy Did Not Waive The Bias Argument By Pleading Guilty Where A Biased Prosecution Is A Structural Error. ii
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of Americ to respond filed.
2024-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Matthew Murphy
Karen Ann Pickett — Pickett Law Offices, PC, Petitioner
Karen Ann Pickett — Pickett Law Offices, PC, Petitioner
United States of Americ
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent